What tactic might a 4-ship formation of F-16s choose against two groups of enemy aircraft that are 10 NM apart?

In a scenario where a 4-ship formation of F-16s faces two groups of enemy aircraft positioned 10 nautical miles apart, the tactic of "Grind" is appropriate because it allows for a sustained attack that maximizes the effectiveness of the F-16s against both groups while minimizing risk.

The "Grind" tactic involves engaging in continuous, progressive combat operations, where the F-16s can maintain pressure on the enemy, systematically reducing their capabilities. This tactic takes advantage of the F-16s' agility, speed, and combat capabilities to engage one group while maintaining situational awareness and readiness to respond to the other group.

Choosing to "Grind" would support the mission by leveraging the F-16s' ability to operate in a spatially structured manner, ensuring that they can control the engagement with both groups effectively. This is particularly important given the separation of the enemy forces, which opens up the possibility for effective targeting without being overwhelmed by a concentrated attack.

The other choices, while they may have their tactical uses, do not convey the same level of strategic engagement over sustained combat scenarios as "Grind" does in this context.